page contents Dead Ball?: Indian Bowler's Bizarre Delivery Sparks Debate – The News Headline
Home / Sports / Dead Ball?: Indian Bowler's Bizarre Delivery Sparks Debate

Dead Ball?: Indian Bowler's Bizarre Delivery Sparks Debate

Cricket is a sport of inventions the place bowlers and batsmen get a hold of new tactics to outwit each and every different. From ‘transfer hits’ to ‘scoops’, through the years batsmen have modified the sport with out-of-the-box photographs however bowlers have had little scope of doing anything else equivalent with the foundations no longer allowing them. Not too long ago, Uttar Pradesh’s left-arm spinner Shiva Singh, taking part in in a CK Nayudu Trophy fit, attempted to fox the batsman together with his strange taste of bowling. On the other hand, the umpire signalled for a ‘useless ball’ because the ball used to be making its approach in opposition to the striker. 

Shiva Singh did a complete 360 level twirl in his run-up, simply ahead of his supply throughout a fit between Bengal and Uttar Pradesh in Kalyani.

However to the disappointment of the bowler and different Uttar Pradesh gamers, umpire Vinod Seshan signalled ‘useless ball’.

Shiva Singh’s unconventional supply briefly went viral on Twitter with former India spinner Bishan Singh Bedi calling it “bizarre”. 

On the other hand, some fanatics had been left scratching their heads over the precise rule and whether or not or no longer Shiva Singh’s supply used to be honest or no longer.

Marylebone Cricket Membership (MCC), the mum or dad of the Regulations of the sport, attempted to deal with the location and got here out with the commentary in regards to the factor.

“In the beginning, the Regulations do not dictate what a bowler’s run-up must appear to be. Below Regulation 21.1, the bowler should state his/her mode of supply, which turns out to had been left arm around the wicket on this case, however does no longer state how standard the bowler’s means must be. 

“Regulation 41.four states

41.four.1 It’s unfair for any fielder intentionally to try to distract the striker whilst he/she is getting ready to obtain or receiving a supply.

41.four.2 If both umpire considers that any motion by way of a fielder is such an try, he/she shall straight away name and sign Lifeless ball and tell the opposite umpire of the cause of the decision,”

“Except the 360 level twirl used to be a part of the bowler’s run-up for each ball, the umpire would possibly want to imagine whether or not he/she feels that the twirl used to be carried out in an try to distract the batsman by hook or by crook. That is specifically so if there used to be no obvious benefit to be won from the twirl, not like, for instance, the bowler various the width of the discharge level or the period of his/her run-up, that are fully lawful,” the MCC added.

About thenewsheadline

Check Also

pullela gopichand hopes india will get badminton gold at tokyo games - Pullela Gopichand Hopes India Will Get Badminton Gold At Tokyo Games

Pullela Gopichand Hopes India Will Get Badminton Gold At Tokyo Games

Pronouncing that “yearly has been higher than the former one”, leader nationwide badminton trainer Pullela …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *